GitLab

The current OS_Memory 7 implementation uses an address range structure
returned by HAL_PhysInfo to decide which part of the physical address
arrangement table to overwrite with RAM information. I suspect the
original intention was for OS_Memory to use this address range to avoid
marking the VRAM as DRAM (HAL_PhysInfo is expected to fill in the VRAM
itself). But by overwriting everything between the start and the end
address, OS_Memory will also overwrite any non-RAM areas which are
sandwiched between RAM banks, e.g. the VideoCore-owned RAM on Pi models
with >1GB RAM. There's also the problem that the address range returned
by the HAL is using 32bit addresses, so it won't work as-is for RAM
located above the 4GB barrier.

Fix these issues by reworking the routine so that it ignores the address
range returned by the HAL and instead detects VRAM by checking the
IsVRAM flag in the PhysRamTable entry. And for detecting if the ROM is
running from RAM, instead of using the address range we can rely on the
flag available via OS_ReadSysInfo 8 (i.e. HAL_PlatformInfo), like
OS_Memory 8 does.

Also add a simple BASIC program (Dev.PhysInfo) to allow easy checking of
HAL & OS physical address arrangement tables.

Version 6.41. Tagged as 'Kernel-6_41'